If you shoot raw, the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2 delivers the goods; if you shoot JPEG, you may be disappointed.
Lori Grunin
I've been reviewing hardware and software, devising testing methodology and handed out buying advice for what seems like forever; I'm currently absorbed by computers and gaming hardware, but previously spent many years concentrating on cameras. I've also volunteered with a cat rescue for over 15 years doing adoptions, designing marketing materials, managing volunteers and, of course, photographing cats.
As is typical of Panasonic's cameras, the built-in, default noise reduction delivers subpar results. Here, if you look at the text, you can see the bump in color NR between ISO 400 and 800 with the concomitant loss of sharpness. However, even as low as ISO 200 the color noise starts to impact the text. Stricly from a noise perspective, I wouldn't shoot JPEGs above ISO 100 in anything but bright sunlight.
2 of 10Matthew Fitzgerald/CNET
Noise, ISO 100, raw vs. JPEG
Even at ISO 100 there's some unwanted noise on flat neutrals--look at the gray card--using the in-camera noise reduction. In part, it looks like it's exacerbated by excessive sharpening. A quick-and-dirty pass on the raw version produces much better results.
3 of 10Lori Grunin/CNET
Noise, ISO 1600, raw vs. JPEG
If you deal with raw files, you can get relatively usable results up to ISO 1600.
Even at ISO 100, JPEGs can have these horrible crunchy artifacts in non-close-ups. I think it's partly due to oversharpening, which can be adjusted in-camera. However, there's no similar problem for macro or zoomed-in shots, so there's no way to globally set the appropriate level of sharpening to cover both situations.
This is a different crop of the previous image, demonstrating how the problem isn't inherent in the images themselves, but in the way the Panasonic is processing them.
6 of 10Lori Grunin/CNET
Artifacts, zoomed in
As usual, when zoomed in, the JPEG results are better--this looks far better from an artifact perspective--but you can still see some minor color noise.
(1/60 sec, f5.6, ISO 100, AWB, 14-42mm lens at 42mm)
7 of 10Lori Grunin/CNET
Distortion, 14mm lens
Panasonic generally does some in-camera distortion control, which is probably why there's so little at this wide an angle.
8 of 10Lori Grunin/CNET
Sharpness, 14-42mm lens
The GF2 with the 14-42mm lens can be pretty sharp, but part of that is artificially boosted. Still, this looks pretty good.
(1/80 sec, f8, spot meter, AWB, ISO 100, 14-42mm lens at 36mm)
9 of 10Lori Grunin/CNET
14mm lens bokeh
The Panasonic 14mm f2.5 lens has some relatively nice-looking bokeh.
(1/1,000 sec, f2.8, pattern metering, raw version of Expressive color mode shot, ISO 100)
10 of 10Lori Grunin/CNET
My Color mode
Though it's kind of nice to have, Panasonic's My Color mode isn't nearly as fun or flexible as Olympus' Art Filters. It does work with video capture, however.